Crime Prevention and Control
 

Crime Reduction Strategies

Many of the Center’s projects operate in a crime prevention framework known as “focused deterrence.”  This framework identifies the core offenders involved in a particular crime problem; creates a law enforcement, community, and social service partnership; opens direct communication with the offenders; and makes clear to them the affected community wants them to stop what they are doing, there is help available to them, and there will be consequences for continued misbehavior.  For more on the focused deterrence framework, see: Pulling Levers: Chronic Offenders, High-Crime Settings, and a Theory of Prevention and Pulling Levers: Getting Deterrence Right.

Two well-developed strategies address serious violence associated with gangs, drug crews, and similar groups of offenders, and “overt” drug markets: street dealers, drug houses, drive-through buyers, and the like.

The Group and Gang Violence Strategy
The gang violence strategy, first demonstrated as “Operation Ceasefire” in Boston in 1996 (the so-called “Boston Miracle”) and subsequently in many other jurisdictions, relies on direct communication to violent groups by a partnership of law-enforcement, service providers, and community figures. Together the partnership delivers a unified “no violence” message, explains that violence will bring law enforcement attention to entire groups, offers services and alternatives to group members, and articulates community norms against violence.

Listen to Center Director David Kennedy outline the strategy, its early success in Boston in the mid-1990s, and its roll-out to more than 50 U.S. cities through the National Network for Safe Communities.

Where properly implemented, rapid reductions in serious violence are routine, with low levels of actual enforcement and the enthusiastic support of affected communities. One recent dramatic example of this is Chicago, which has used a variation on the strategy to reduce the homicide rate in several exceptionally violent neighborhoods by 37% (see “Attention Felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhoods in Chicago”).  The strategy is flexible and adapted to any given jurisdiction, but is also quite well understood; for an implementation outline, click here.  For more material on the approach, see Publications section.

The Drug Market Strategy
First demonstrated in High Point, North Carolina, in 2004, and often known as the “High Point strategy,” the drug market strategy is designed to close neighborhood drug markets permanently.  Moving drug market by drug market in any particular jurisdiction, it identifies street-level dealers; arrests violent offenders; suspends cases for non-violent dealers, and brings together drug dealers, their families, law enforcement and criminal justice officials, service providers, and community leaders for a meeting that makes clear the dealing has to stop, the community cares for the offenders but reject their conduct, help is available, and renewed dealing will result in the activation of the existing case. 

This strategy has been shown to almost completely eliminate these markets, with low levels of arrest and prosecution; rebuild relationships between minority communities and law enforcement; and redirect the lives of drug dealers. 

For details on how the strategy was first applied in High Point, NC, see Chapter 9 of David Kennedy’s book, Deterrence and Crime Prevention: Reconsidering the Prospect of Sanction. For an implementation outline, see Bureau of Justice Assistance: Drug Market Intervention Program. For more material on the approach see: "Novel Police Tactic Puts Drug Markets Out of Business" (The Wall Street Journal, 09/27/2006); New Program Reforms Drug-Torn Neighborhood; Closing Crack Highway; and Street Known for Drug Crime is Getting Clean.

 

CENTER SPOTLIGHTS

Campbell Review Supports Efficacy of Center's Crime Prevention Strategies
A Campbell Collaboration Systematic Review, the gold standard in evaluating social science interventions, has found “strong empirical evidence” for the effectiveness of the approaches to addressing serious violent crime and overt drug markets developed and advanced by the Center for Crime Prevention and Control.  The Effects of “Pulling Levers” Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime  (Braga & Weisburd, 2011) confirms what the research record and field experience have long suggested:  that a crime prevention approach that combines deterrence with elements that encourage offenders away from crime, strengthen a community’s collective efficacy, and enhance police legitimacy can create “noteworthy crime reductions.” 

Thinking Outside the Cell
In this
interview with CUNY TV's Criminal Justice Matters, Center Director David Kennedy explains why the strategies developed by the Center for Crime Prevention and Control can reduce both serious violent crime and the problem of mass incarceration by empowering communities to reassert their own public safety standards, allowing law enforcement to step back.

 
 

 


Don't Shoot
Read an excerpt from Center Director David Kennedy's new book or click on the cover image above for further information. Highlights from a reading, including a conversation with John Seabrook from The New Yorker, can be viewed here.   


 


Photo: Thomas McMillan/New Haven Independent 

Fighting Back: Violence in Our Cities 
As one of the panelists of a multimedia event in New Haven, CT, Center Director David Kennedy discusses how to rebuild trust between the community and police and stem the tide of murders in the city as its new police chief, Dean Esserman, prepares to implement the Center's crime prevention strategies.

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Center for Crime Prevention and Control
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
555 West 57th Street, Room 601
New York, NY 10019
Tel: 212 484 1323
John Jay is CUNY